What is the difference between Gong Han test tube baby and natural pregnancy?
As an assisted reproductive technology, IVF is becoming more and more popular among women with cold uterus. Uterine cold refers to the condition that the thickness of endometrium is insufficient, which leads to the difficulty of natural pregnancy. In contrast, natural pregnancy refers to the realization of pregnancy through normal sexual life. The following will elaborate on the differences between Gong Han IVF and natural pregnancy from four aspects.
1. Different ways of pregnancy
Gong Han IVF is conceived through artificial assistant technology, and the most commonly used method is in vitro fertilization. In this process, the doctor will combine sperm with egg, and then transplant the fertilized egg into the female uterus. In contrast, natural pregnancy is achieved through normal sexual life. The male sperm enters the uterus and fallopian tube through the cervix, combines with the female egg, and finally achieves the goal of pregnancy.
In addition, technology such as frozen embryo transfer can also be used for Gong Han IVF. This means that even if in vitro fertilization is not successful, the fertilized egg can be transferred to the female uterus at an appropriate time by freezing the embryo, so as to improve the success rate of pregnancy.
2. Difference in pregnancy success rate
Compared with natural pregnancy, the pregnancy success rate of test tube babies with uterine cold is higher. This is because in women with cold uterus, the thickness of endometrium is difficult to meet the implantation needs of fertilized eggs. In the process of IVF, doctors can improve the endometrial thickness and the success rate of pregnancy and implantation through appropriate drug treatment. In addition, women with Gong Han can also select the most suitable embryos for transfer by artificially controlling the selection of fertilized eggs, further improving the success rate of pregnancy.
Although the success rate of natural pregnancy is relatively low, there are also certain opportunities. Therefore, natural pregnancy is still a feasible choice for women without obvious uterine cold.
3. Difference in time and economic cost
The treatment process of uterine cold test tube babies usually needs to go through multiple cycles, involving multiple hospital visits and treatments. This is a challenge for patients both in terms of time and economy. Relatively speaking, the process of natural pregnancy is relatively simple, without additional medical intervention, only sexual behavior between husband and wife.
Of course, according to individual conditions, doctors will comprehensively consider and recommend patients to try natural pregnancy or uterine cold test tube baby. For older women or women with other serious fertility disorders, IVF may be a more appropriate choice.
4. Difference in accuracy
The uterine cold test tube baby is more accurate in pre pregnancy screening and diagnosis. Through relevant inspection and evaluation, doctors can comprehensively evaluate women's eggs and men's sperm, and screen the quality of fertilized eggs. This can reduce the incidence of genetic diseases and chromosome abnormalities. In natural pregnancy, the risk of genetic diseases and chromosomal abnormalities cannot be assessed in advance.
summary
To sum up, there are obvious differences in pregnancy mode, pregnancy success rate, time, economic cost and accuracy between uterine cold test tube baby and natural pregnancy. For women with cold uterus, IVF technology can provide higher pregnancy success rate and more accurate pre pregnancy screening, but it also requires more time and economic costs. For women without obvious uterine cold, natural pregnancy is still a feasible option. Therefore, when making decisions, patients should consider comprehensively according to their personal conditions and doctors' suggestions, and choose the most appropriate way to achieve their pregnancy aspirations.
