Difference between milk test tube baby and natural pregnancy
Both IVF and natural pregnancy are ways of producing offspring, but there are some obvious differences in the process and results between the two. This article will elaborate on IVF and natural pregnancy from four aspects: experience, success rate, time and cost.
1. Experience
Natural pregnancy is a natural process. Both husband and wife mate through sexual life and conceive naturally through normal reproductive organs. This process has romantic and intimate experience, and couples can share the joy and expectation of this process.
The milk test tube baby is an assisted reproductive technology. Women transfer the fertilized eggs into the uterus through in vitro fertilization or other technologies in hospitals or laboratories. This process usually requires multiple attempts, and the implanted fertilized egg may be underdeveloped, so it will undergo a series of inspections and operations. Compared with natural pregnancy, the experience of IVF may be more medical and stressful, and the trade-offs and pressures between couples may also be different.
In addition, in vitro milk babies may also be involved in hormone therapy. Intervention on female hormone levels may lead to physical and emotional changes. Therefore, in terms of experience, there are obvious differences between IVF and natural pregnancy.
2. Success rate
The success rate of natural pregnancy is determined by many factors, including the age, health status and living habits of both spouses. According to medical research, under normal circumstances, the probability of successful pregnancy is about 10% to 25% between husband and wife in their relaxed sexual life.
The success rate of breast test tube infants is more accurate and controllable. Through assisted reproductive technology, doctors can help couples solve fertility problems and increase the possibility of fertilization and pregnancy. The success rate of IVF depends on many factors, including doctors' experience, technical level and laboratory equipment conditions. The success rate of different hospitals may vary. However, in general, the success rate of IVF is relatively high, which can reach more than 30% to 60%.
Therefore, from the perspective of success rate, IVF is more advantageous than natural pregnancy.
3. Time
The time of natural pregnancy is uncertain, and every couple's situation is different. Some couples can successfully conceive within a few months, while others may take several years. Natural pregnancy requires waiting for the right time, which is uncertain.
The process of IVF is complex and takes a long time. First, relevant inspections and evaluations are required, and then assisted reproductive technology is carried out. The rehabilitation process before and after the operation also needs some time. The whole process may take several months or even more than a year. Therefore, compared with natural pregnancy, IVF requires more time investment.
4. Cost
The cost of natural pregnancy is relatively low, mainly related to daily life and health care costs. Couples can have normal offspring through sexual life, without additional investment.
The cost of IVF is relatively high. In addition to equipment and technology costs, it also includes medical examination, operation costs and post operation care costs. The cost of milk test tube baby may be more expensive, which requires both husband and wife to have a certain economic affordability.
Summary
There are obvious differences between IVF and natural pregnancy in experience, success rate, time and cost. The experience of IVF may be more intense and medical, and the success rate is relatively high, but it needs longer time and higher economic investment. While natural pregnancy is more romantic and natural, but the success rate and time are uncertain. Couples should consider their own specific conditions and needs when choosing the birth mode, and make decisions by comprehensive weighing.
